Very interested in your work, very excited about the deepening ties between formal linguistics and the ‘harder’ sciences. Will definitely check back often for updates on the journal.

Thanks. Thankyou also for UNDERSTANDING MINIMALISM,good book, would be lost without it.
ciao, mort

ps-Why is there no one else here? It seems the linguists dominate, at least here.

paramedics certainly are handy, but only if you intend intend hurting or breaking something. we linguists tend to lead docile lives, hidden away in musty corners, collecting dust. However, I feel the reason for the uh, lack of participation is probably due to the fact that science seems a daunting topic, even for punks. It is a bit serious, but serious is not necessarily bad. I don’t feel qualified really, to begin a discussion on science at large, perhaps monsieur grohmann should say something, something about uhmm, Edge Features. what do you understand by edge features? any links you think might prove useful would be uhm, useful. I’m trying to piece together enough of a reference/definition to actually use them in my thesis for derivations, but they seem to be slippery bastards, difficult to define.the writings of chomsky not helping much. although I realise he might be the only one sayin anything about them.
ciao, m

This is awesome. If you haven’t already, check out some of the recent papers presented at Society of Neuroscience. Neurolinguisitics is vogue as hell right now.